“There’s no substitute for displacement,” goes a well-worn automotive axiom. Nonetheless, like so many issues that had been true manner again when, that is now not the case. Immediately’s turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engines are able to producing way more horsepower than anybody would have thought potential again within the “golden days” of the large-displacement V-8 engine.
- Make
-
Mercedes-Benz
- Mannequin
-
AMG GLC 63 SUV
- Section
-
Compact Luxurious SUV
In actual fact, essentially the most superior up to date 2.0-liter turbo fours outperform most of the ground-pounding, heart-thumping, pavement-crinkling V-8s that had been held in such excessive regard again within the “good outdated days.” For proof, one want look no farther than the 2025 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E Efficiency SUV with which I spent per week. The high-performing Mercedes’ base worth was $86,050. The value as examined for the model I sampled was $115,415.
As a way to give you an trustworthy and unbiased overview, the automobile reviewed on this article was pushed each day all through the course of every day life for a interval of 1 week. For detailed perception into testing procedures and information assortment, please overview our methodology coverage.
2025 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E Efficiency First Impressions
Earlier iterations of the GLC 63 S had been provided solely as an SUV coupe. Fortunately, this apply has been deserted. One can now have the highest-performing engine in the usual SUV physique, which, to my eye, is much better trying. The proportions of the coupe by no means appeared proper to me. Frankly although, that is true of each SUV “coupe” I’ve ever seen.
Whereas I even have but to totally embrace the concept of a high-performance road-going SUV — interval — at the very least this one is healthier trying than most. I notably like the best way its softly rounded contours function a counterpoint to the hardcore efficiency potential lurking inside the confines of the 2025 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E Efficiency. Granted, its 21-inch wheels and ultra-low-profile Michelin Pilot Sport tires are a tip-off. Nonetheless, all however the cognoscenti will miss such particulars. In consequence, the vast majority of the general public would discover it laborious to consider the this Mercedes SUV harbors a lot firepower.
These within the know, nevertheless, would pay attention to the AMG vertical-bar grille and AMG-specific decrease facias, together with the facet sills and rear diffuser framing a set of 4 exhaust shops, and chorus from difficult the GLC’s pilot to an impromptu contest of pace. For the remainder of you, let me inform you proper now, for those who ever discover your Mustang, Camaro, Challenger, or Charger sitting subsequent to one in all these at a visitors sign, the expression in your face had greatest be one in all quiet appreciation if you make eye contact with its driver. In any other case, you will discover your self with a quickly diminishing view of that quartet of exhaust ideas receding towards the horizon.
Exterior Dimensions
|
Size |
187 Inches |
|
|
Width |
75.6 Inches |
|
|
Peak |
64.4 Inches |
|
|
Wheelbase |
113.7 Inches |
|
|
Entrance Observe |
64.8 Inches |
|
|
Rear Observe |
64.8 Inches |
|
|
Curb Weight |
5115 Kilos |
Associated
2026 Mercedes-AMG GLC EV Caught On Digital camera With A A lot Prettier Face
Mercedes is completed with the jellybean search for its EVs.
Driving Impressions And Efficiency
Getting again to outdated beliefs, there was a time when “hybrid” meant gradual however fuel-efficient. A lot of the justification of this may be lain on the ft of the Toyota Prius, because it was the primary hybrid mannequin to get pleasure from common recognition. Nonetheless, within the case of the GLC 63 S, the “E Efficiency” designation refers to a 201-horsepower electrical motor powering the GLC 63’s rear wheels. This, when allowed to unleash its full potential, pairs with the 469-horsepower turbo 4 to ship a complete system output of 671 horsepower and 752 pound-feet of torque. A nine-speed automated transmission conducts energy output to the wheels. All the time in the precise gear, whatever the scenario, I by no means discovered myself wanting for a downshift as I exited a quick nook. The gear change had been performed on the best way in.
Getting again to that turbocharger, it too employs an electrical motor. This one is tasked with retaining the blower spinning always. To this finish, the turbo spins at 3,230 RPM when the engine is idling at 940 RPM. Thus, the turbo’s full output is all the time immediately accessible, which supplies the two.0-liter 4 the power to ship its full potential with no turbo lag. (There’s yet one more time period from the great outdated days that now not applies.)
In line with the oldsters at Mercedes-AMG — and backed up by my scientific-unscientific observations — runs to 60 from naught may be achieved in simply over three seconds. Moreover, the Mercedes SUV will hit 100 in much less time than it takes most vehicles to achieve 60 — just below seven seconds. The 2025 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E Efficiency can even run the quarter in simply over 11 seconds and attain a high pace of 171 miles per hour.
The know-how governing the suspension and steering methods is equally forward-thinking. Adjustable by means of three settings, Consolation, Sport, and Sport +, steering effort and response may be tailor-made to your particular preferences. Equally, dealing with may be set as much as rival that of the very best sports activities sedans you’ll be able to title whereas sustaining an uncanny suppleness. There’s no jarring over uneven pavement. The GLC 63 S additionally provides a level of rear-wheel steering to assist tighten its line within the corners. Lengthy story brief, this technological tour de pressure is a twenty first century driver’s machine by means of and thru.
Efficiency Specs
|
Engine |
2.0-liter Turbo Gasoline Inline 4 And Electrical Motor |
|
Transmission |
9-Velocity Automated |
|
Horsepower |
671 HP @ 6,750 RPM |
|
Torque |
752 LB-FT @ 5,500 RPM |
|
Gasoline Financial system (CMB) |
19 MPG |
|
0-60 MPH |
3.1 Seconds |
|
Prime Velocity |
171 MPH |
Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S Gasoline Financial system
Even higher, this highest-performing model of the Mercedes-AMG SUV delivered what I might time period cheap gasoline financial system given its efficiency potential — together with my propensity to use it to its fullest. The EPA charges it at 30 MPGE with gasoline and electrical energy, and 20 MPG mixed working on gasoline solely. I noticed a stable 20 MPG total, in a mixture of aggressive back-road driving, freeway cruising, and around-town stopping and going. And sure, I’ll be the primary to confess that quantity must be larger, given we’re speaking a few hybrid system with a turbo 4. However that electrical motor ain’t there for miles per gallon. It is all about smiles per gallon. As soon as I’d skilled the adrenal rush that went with giving the GLC 63 S full throttle — once I had room to do it — refraining from doing so was manner too tough.
|
Metropolis |
Freeway |
Mixed |
|
|
EPA Rated Financial system (Gasoline Solely) |
19 MPG |
21 MPG |
20 MPG |
|
Gasoline Financial system As Examined |
20 MPG |
Inside Design And Consolation
The most important inside distinction between the AMG GLCs and the usual variations is the optionally available AMG Efficiency Seat Bundle. Although they proved supernaturally able to holding me in place throughout aggressive cornering maneuvers, the seats couldn’t truthfully be regarded as snug. The outer bolsters did supply some adjustability, however sliding over them to get located within the driver’s seat was a chore. I’d go for the traditional sports activities seats had been I to enlist a GLC 63 S as my every day driver.
In any other case, the inside design was straight-up up to date Benz. The sprint high was dominated by a trio of air vents, which modified shade as I adjusted the HVAC system’s temperature. Asking for hotter air made them glow pink, whereas a request for a cool breeze resulted in blue. The middle console swept fluidly into the sprint, which was trimmed in extremely polished carbon fiber. Further tasty bits of package included a panoramic sunroof, illuminated door sill plates, ventilated seats, a heated steering wheel, and premium leather-based upholstery.
Except for the AMG seats, total consolation was excellent, with greater than sufficient leg, hip, shoulder, and headroom within the entrance seats. The rear lodging had been a bit on the tight facet although. Nonetheless, younger youngsters can be glad again there throughout prolonged drives. Particularly so, once they might coerce the dad or mum on the wheel to unleash its full energy.
Inside Dimensions
|
Entrance |
Rear |
|
|
Headroom |
38.9 Inches |
39.6 Inches |
|
Shoulder Room |
57.3 Inches |
56.6 Inches |
|
Hip Room |
59 Inches |
58.3 Inches |
|
Legroom |
40.7 Inches |
37.4 Inches |
Know-how And Ease Of Use
Mirroring a present development that appears to be gathering momentum, the GLC 63’s management interfaces had been devoid of conventional switches. Almost all the pieces was performed by contact. What’s extra, this prolonged past the iPad-sized 11.3-inch touchscreen to incorporate “sliders” on the steering wheel in addition to on a panel beneath the touchscreen. The steering wheel did home a few dials for engine and suspension efficiency parameter choice, however that was it so far as the dials had been involved.
With that famous, given the sheer adjustability in addition to the preponderance of its consolation and comfort options, I can see how a contact answer can be thought-about sensible. And, much more so when you think about the quantity of customization achievable when it comes to the GLC 63’s efficiency parameters. The excellent news is when you’ve configured all the pieces to your liking, you most likely received’t have to fiddle round with it anymore. Nonetheless, the training curve is likely to be a bit steep for these for whom up to date know-how is considerably indistinguishable from prestidigitation.
Alternatively, many of the main consolation and comfort options could possibly be actuated by voice as commonplace tools. Wi-fi Apple CarPlay and Android Android compatibility had been commonplace, too. “My” GLC 63 S additionally featured a head-up show and a Burmester audio system. Given how cool all of it appears to be like in apply, I can perceive the problem the engineering crew will need to have encountered when contemplating potential alternate options. Nonetheless, although, it struck me as being simply this facet of a bit a lot.
Cargo And Storage Area
Whereas it isn’t prone to be a top-of-mind consideration for many people who find themselves critically contemplating the acquisition of a GLC 63 S E Efficiency Mercedes, cargo capability is an affordable 57.4 cubic ft with the second row of seats folded away. You’ll get pleasure from 24.5 cubic ft with the rear seats deployed. And, in fact, the standard array of cupholders, door cubbies, and middle console storage was accessible. The middle console’s cupholders resided beneath a retractable cowl to take care of a clear look when the cupholders weren’t wanted. The wi-fi charging pad was additionally hosted inside that compartment.
|
Minimal Cargo Capability |
24.5 Cubic-Toes |
|
Cargo Capability Second-Row |
57.9 Cubic-Toes |
2025 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E Efficiency Vs. Its Opponents
The 2025 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E Efficiency’s most formidable rivals are the Porsche Macan GTS and the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio. Pricewise, the Mercedes is available in decrease than each of these fashions whereas providing better horsepower. Nonetheless, the Mercedes can also be fairly a bit heavier, so the efficiency numbers of all three are fairly related.
2025 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E Efficiency Vs. Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
- Base Trim Engine
-
2.9L Twin-Turbo V6 Gasoline
- Base Trim Transmission
-
8-Velocity Automated
- Base Trim Drivetrain
-
All-Wheel Drive
- Base Trim Horsepower
-
505 hp
- Base Trim Torque
-
443 lb-ft @ 2500 rpm
The Alfa’s Italian taste makes the Stelvio a standout amongst compact SUVs. What’s extra, the 2025 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio reveals excellent dynamics over the highway. Powered by a 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged V-6, the 505-horsepower Alfa provides up 166 horsepower and 303 pound-feet of torque to the Mercedes. Nonetheless, it additionally weighs some 800 kilos much less, in order that they run just about neck and neck. The Alfa boasts a 0-60 of three.3 seconds to the Mercedes’ 3.1. The Stelvio Quadrifoglio additionally runs the quarter in 11.8 seconds and has a high pace of 176 miles per hour. Alternatively, the Mercedes provides superior ergonomics, a nicer inside bundle, and a status for higher reliability. The Mercedes can also be extra spacious and has better cargo capability.
2025 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S E Efficiency Vs. Porsche Macan GTS
- Mannequin
-
Macan GTS
- Engine
-
2.9-liter twin-turbo V6
- Transmission
-
7-speed dual-clutch automated (PDK)
- Horsepower
-
434 hp
Whereas BMW was the primary marque to introduce a pavement-focused high-performance SUV, Porsche may be stated to have perfected it. Driving the Macan GTS leaves little doubt as to its provenance, with excellent dealing with, satisfying acceleration and a well-crafted inside therapy. Just like the Alfa, energy for the GTS model of the Macan is sourced from a twin-turbocharged 3.0-liter V-6. Nonetheless, the Porsche “solely” makes 434 horsepower and 405 pound-feet of torque. It additionally weighs about the identical because the Alfa, so the Italian is marginally faster and a tiny bit quicker. The Porsche’s 0-60 is cited at 3.5 seconds, and its quarter-mile time is claimed to be 12.1 seconds. Prime pace is a quoted 169 miles per hour. Nonetheless, whereas significantly much less highly effective than the Mercedes, the Porsche provides higher ergonomics whereas having fun with a status commensurate to that of its Mercedes rival when it comes to reliability.
Our Advice For Which Mannequin You Ought to Purchase
All three of those high-performance compact SUVs have related efficiency figures. And, the tenths of seconds separating them are largely negligible in actual world conditions. Whereas the Alfa is arguably the prettiest of the three, neither the Porsche nor the Mercedes may be stated to be ugly. Alternatively, the Porsche and the Mercedes do greatest the Alfa when it comes to high quality, match, and end.
In terms of sheer technical prowess, the nod should go to the Mercedes. In spite of everything, it will get way more efficiency from two fewer cylinders and handles simply in addition to each the Alfa and the Porsche — regardless of being heavier — due to equally intelligent engineering. Conversely, the Alfa and Porsche supply complimentary upkeep for a yr or 10,000 miles, whereas the Mercedes doesn’t. And, in fact, there’s Alfa’s spotty status for reliability to think about.
Personally, the Porsche can be my first alternative, because it has much less tech to fail than the Mercedes, whereas being simply as fast and agile. My second alternative can be the GLC 63 S. This isn’t to say the Alfa is wholly undesirable by any stretch of the creativeness. In actual fact, its look is extra prone to get the eye of passersby than both of the German choices. With that stated, I feel the Porsche and Mercedes would maintain up higher over the long term, and each would doubtless have higher resale worth when the time to maneuver on to the following automotive journey rolls round.

